- A fixed (or quantitative) design does not seem very appropriate for my intended topic. The only way I think I could incorporate that sort of methodology would be to see whether library instruction has an impact on students' grades. While that idea is certainly interesting, I'm not sure I want to go there. Based on the little bit of literature I have reviewed, I believe others may have already conducted a similar study. Also this would not incorporate the focus on activities that I was aiming for.
- If I really did want to make my research multi-strategy, it would be interesting to compare students' grades from library sessions without activities to sessions with activities. I will have to consider this further.
- All that being said, I really think that at least half of my proposal is going to call for a flexible approach, and if I want to gauge students' opinions of activities during library instruction, a survey is probably the best way to obtain that information. I know that the librarians in TCL already have students fill out short surveys at the end of their instruction (if there is enough time). However, to see what students think about activities would require a separate/new survey.
- Found some potentially relevant articles in EBSCOhost (all the Library* databases and Academic Search Complete). Some good subject terms are "library orientation," "active learning," and "information literacy." Will have to look further into those articles.
I think that is all for now, though I feel like I am forgetting some of the things I meant to include. I suppose when/if I remember, I will edit this post. Goodbye for now!